Timeline for What should our domain name be?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 22, 2010 at 22:15 | comment | added | Pops |
@ShreevatsaR, SOIS's policy is strongly against anything other than .com .
|
|
Sep 22, 2010 at 11:45 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | In principle we could try presentperfect.org or presentperfect.net etc., but there's the risk of confusion. | |
Aug 30, 2010 at 13:22 | comment | added | Noldorin | There is a fully-fledged website there now. I think we're out of luck. | |
Aug 28, 2010 at 16:50 | history | edited | Pops | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
update
|
Aug 28, 2010 at 16:48 | comment | added | Pops | @Reg, that website makes me a little sad. | |
Aug 28, 2010 at 16:47 | comment | added | Pops | @dave, I used to think that, but The Bosses have spoken otherwise. "If the name is registered but is being 'squatted,' i.e., there’s something there, it’s just not anything worthwhile, ask the owner if they would sell. If it’s available for a reasonable amount of money, and it’s a great name, and the community loves it, we may even be able to buy it." -Joel ( source ) | |
Aug 27, 2010 at 23:24 | comment | added | RegDwigнt | An excellent name to attract native speakers. However, to people who learn English by browsing YouTube and Digg, it sounds like yet another online gift shop. In fact, there is present-perfect.de, who are selling promotional items. | |
Aug 20, 2010 at 23:40 | comment | added | davebug | Seems to me that "not available" has to disqualify it, unless there's a specific acceptable listed price. | |
Aug 6, 2010 at 5:12 | history | answered | Pops | CC BY-SA 2.5 |