I don't think it is appropriate to call other ELU users EL&U. Single word-request junkies. That's name-calling and it's against Be Nice policy:

Name-calling. Focus on the post, not the person. That includes terms that feel personal even when they're applied to posts (like "lazy", "ignorant", or "whiny").

If you don't agree with other users who voted to close or migrate the question, you can just state the reasons why you don't agree and ask other users to migrate it back to ELU. It could be more efficient to post a request on ELL Meta.

Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users

I don't agree with this idea. Not only will it be against the community-driven mechanism of Stack Exchange, but also it could lock basic and ELL questions such as Can I use "has" after being a noun?. This question has been asked and answered repeatedly. I wonder what makes you think this kind of basic learner's question should be answered again on ELU. Why is it so difficult to research and find references for the question like this? Singular vs. Plural with Multiple Gerunds as Subject (IE: [Gerund] and [Gerund] are/is [something].) and Gerunds and Infinitives: Their Noun Roles. Should this question be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts? I don't think so. This question should have been closed as duplicate or lack of research. (Note the links above are the first two I found after searching "verb agreement after gerund/ing").

I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question

Users who continuously ignore the guidelines of ELU and answer off-topic and basic questions shouldn't be able to vote to reopen a question, either. You should raise this issue on Meta SE.

I don't think it is appropriate to call other ELU users EL&U. Single word-request junkies. That's name-calling and it's against Be Nice policy:

Name-calling. Focus on the post, not the person. That includes terms that feel personal even when they're applied to posts (like "lazy", "ignorant", or "whiny").

If you don't agree with other users who voted to close or migrate the question, you can just state the reasons why you don't agree and ask other users to migrate it back to ELU. It could be more efficient to post a request on ELL Meta.

Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users

I don't agree with this idea. Not only will it be against the community-driven mechanism of Stack Exchange, but also it could lock basic and ELL questions such as Can I use "has" after being a noun?. This question has been asked and answered repeatedly. I wonder what makes you think this kind of basic learner's question should be answered again on ELU. Why is it so difficult to research and find references for the question like this? Singular vs. Plural with Multiple Gerunds as Subject (IE: [Gerund] and [Gerund] are/is [something].) and Gerunds and Infinitives: Their Noun Roles. Should this question be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts? I don't think so. This question should have been closed as duplicate or lack of research. (Note the links above are the first two I found after searching "verb agreement after gerund/ing").

I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question

Users who continuously ignore the guidelines of ELU and answer off-topic and basic questions shouldn't be able to vote to reopen a question, either. You should raise this issue on Meta SE.

I don't think it is appropriate to call other ELU users EL&U. Single word-request junkies. That's name-calling and it's against Be Nice policy:

Name-calling. Focus on the post, not the person. That includes terms that feel personal even when they're applied to posts (like "lazy", "ignorant", or "whiny").

If you don't agree with other users who voted to close or migrate the question, you can just state the reasons why you don't agree and ask other users to migrate it back to ELU. It could be more efficient to post a request on ELL Meta.

Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users

I don't agree with this idea. Not only will it be against the community-driven mechanism of Stack Exchange, but also it could lock basic and ELL questions such as Can I use "has" after being a noun?. This question has been asked and answered repeatedly. I wonder what makes you thin this kind of basic learner's question should be answered again on ELU. Why is it so difficult to research and find references for the question like this? Singular vs. Plural with Multiple Gerunds as Subject (IE: [Gerund] and [Gerund] are/is [something].) and Gerunds and Infinitives: Their Noun Roles. Should this question be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts? I don't think so. This question should have been closed as duplicate or lack of research. (Note the links above are the first two I found after searching "verb agreement after gerund/ing").

I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question

Users who continuously ignore the guidelines of ELU and answer off-topic and basic questions shouldn't be able to vote to reopen a question, either. You should raise this issue on Meta SE.

I don't think it is appropriate to call other ELU users EL&U. Single word-request junkies. That's name-calling and it's against Be Nice policy:

Name-calling. Focus on the post, not the person. That includes terms that feel personal even when they're applied to posts (like "lazy", "ignorant", or "whiny").

If you don't agree with other users who voted to close or migrate the question, you can just state the reasons why you don't agree and ask other users to migrate it back to ELU. It could be more efficient to post a request on ELL Meta.

Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users

I don't agree with this idea. Not only will it be against the community-driven mechanism of Stack Exchange, but also it could lock basic and ELL questions such as Can I use "has" after being a noun?. This question has been asked and answered repeatedly. I wonder what makes you think this kind of basic learner's question should be answered again on ELU. Why is it so difficult to research and find references for the question like this? Singular vs. Plural with Multiple Gerunds as Subject (IE: [Gerund] and [Gerund] are/is [something].) and Gerunds and Infinitives: Their Noun Roles. Should this question be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts? I don't think so. This question should have been closed as duplicate or lack of research. (Note the links above are the first two I found after searching "verb agreement after gerund/ing").

I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question

Users who continuously ignore the guidelines of ELU and answer off-topic and basic questions shouldn't be able to vote to reopen a question, either. You should raise this issue on Meta SE.