I refer to this topic:
I ask the person who downvoted my answer, why. I have a guess who may be, since some comments are self-explanatory. For example see the answer "If it is a spelling error (which I'm inclined to agree)" says everything about the prejudice. When you don't want to concede something, you deny it. In my opinion when there is an evident attack to a person, and not the answer he gives, well that spoils the whole experience of the exchange. If the idea is bad, you can downvote it of course, better with a comment, and best if the comment is well argumented. I hope that someone can give it here an objective look, and see it through with impartiality.
I am discouraged enough to go on here on this basis. For that reason I think I will leave ESE to the people who rule it in this way, and let the others enjoy it the way it is.