I have to say about the questions so far that a lot of them seem to be quite fake in the sense that someone is asking a question just to get points or to seed the site with questions. What does anyone else think?
There is no objective way of knowing whether or not any particular question is "fake".
The main point of the site is to be a useful Q&A which is interesting to the people who use it. If questions do not correspond to the needs and interests of the people using the site, then the question will be downvoted anyway.
If questions are being upvoted, obviously other people want answers to those questions, which immediately makes each question not fake.
Personally, I have found most questions on the site to be quite interesting, and I have learnt a heck of a lot from reading the answers to other people's questions.
At this point, I think seeding the site is a valid reason for asking questions.
If the purpose of the site is to be a useful resource for information about English Language and Usage, and not a video game to see who has the most rep, then I don't see how the motivation of the person asking the question is a big concern.
That is, if it is an interesting/good question that leads to providing valuable content to the site, who gives a flip if the person who asked it is rep-whoring?
Perhaps the answer to a fake question is to give a fake vote?
But I don't know if I can tell the difference between an interesting and genuine question and an interesting but fake question.