No idea why you are classifying my response as plagiarism. Really none at all.
The principal problem is that you did not cite your quote. I've done that for you on this occasion in order that the post can be undeleted.
Quoting from a search engine is insufficient. You need to cite the original source. This is explained in the Meta.SE question to which MetaEd linked in his comment and in the ELU Help page on referencing. We also have relevant questions on Meta.ELU: What to do about missing source attributions? and "New attribution rules"
— Oxford Dictionaries ([Definition](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/harridan) and [synonyms](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/thesaurus/harridan)) via [Bing](https://www.bing.com/search?q=harridan&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMN).
Note also what the Meta.SE page says:
Remember, you still have to write an actual answer, in your own words. A post that consists only of copied text, even when attributed, is not your work either.
That may mean that your post will be deleted again, even with the attribution added. In order to avert that possibility, edit it to explain why you like "harridan" and why "a strict, bossy, or belligerent old woman" is someone who henpecks.