The following question, besides being formulated in a much more detailed way, offers a lot of good information in answers that the “supposed original one” does not.
Although I'm not a fan of single-word requests, I am a fan of due process, and the process established at EL&U for closing a question involves identifying—from a menu of rationales for closure—some specific fault in the question and closing it for that reason. Once that fault is corrected, however, the specific rationale for closure loses its validity and there is no reason, as a matter of due process, for the question to remain closed under the no-longer-applicable close reason.
In this particular case, the question poster seems to be quite interested in satisfying the formal requirements for a question at this site. Evidently, close voters have already closed the question for two separate reasons, each of which has subsequently been addressed through edits of the question.
Assuming that the current closure is eventually overturned, it is certainly possible that a third close reason—such as "duplicate of an existing question"—may justify closing the question a third time. But I hope that site participants don't adopt as their attitude toward question closure the view of a hanging judge in a frontier town: "I don't care if he's guilty of the specific charges that the prosecution laid against him; I just care that he gets hanged."
Questions on choosing an ideal word or phrase must include information on how it will be used in order to be answered. For help writing a good word or phrase request, see: About single word requests
Please stop attempting to solicit people to break this community's self-determined quality standards. This question should be closed.
And don't you dare try to edit it. Only the OP can know the context they want to use it in in order to show us how they want to use it. Only they know if they want a noun, adjective, or verb.