11

Just spotted a new uniquity tag, for words that express uniqueness. While I don't object to the idea of the tag, I'm puzzled by its name, which appears to be a rare, possibly obsolete variant of uniqueness. Should it be changed or syn-linked to the more common term? Or is there some reason to expect that people will use it more as currently spelled?

| |
  • 3
    Argh...just say it's not a word...because it's not. Retag all to uniqueness and be done with it. – Mitch Mar 30 '14 at 2:57
  • It's a uniquely silly tag. – Mari-Lou A Mar 30 '14 at 7:32
  • 1
    I would read ‘uniquity’ as [ˌʌnˈɪkwɪti], i.e., as a somewhat mis-prefixed alternative form of iniquity, perhaps a portmanteau of iniquity and unequal. It would not have occurred to me, if I’d just seen the tag, that it actually referred to uniqueness. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Mar 30 '14 at 17:53
  • 3
    @JanusBahsJacquet You will find that uniquity is listed in the OED as meaning the same as uniqueness, and to have been around since the 18th century. I like to think uniquity has certain contrasts with ubiquity, stretching matters though that may be. – tchrist Mar 31 '14 at 4:18
  • @tchrist Yes, noticed the similarity to ubiquity, but also the resemblance to a malapropism for iniquity. Glad this caught your attention. – Bradd Szonye Mar 31 '14 at 7:22
  • @tchrist It's also in MW. Makes me think of Uniqua. – Elliott Frisch Apr 4 '14 at 18:55
  • @tchrist Yeah I like that. Presuming that, in enough people's minds, it suggests, and stands in contrast to, ubiquity - then it seems like a cool word to have in the repertoire. – Hal Apr 9 '14 at 20:04
7

We should not have a . I'm looking at the current questions tagged with it and am not seeing anything useful in grouping those questions together. Of the current 7 questions:

  • 5 questions are asking for a word that means something similar to "unique"
  • 1 question is asking about words that have unique meanings
  • 1 question seems completely unrelated

Questions about words that mean X should not be placed in . This leaves Is there a term for words that have a single meaning or are only used in a single context? as the only relevant question and a tag with only one question in it is kind of useless.

I vote we remove the tag entirely.

| |
  • 1
    It looks like tchrist tagged all of the posts very recently; hopefully he can drop in and explain the tag. – Bradd Szonye Mar 29 '14 at 21:37
0

it could be incorrect to consider the word Uniquity to be redundant/obsolete as it's usage is not unlike well versed. uniquity is more the disposition of "uniqueness" than "uniqueness" itself; it is also the "degree" or "grade" of "uniqueness." moreover, it is the set of properties purported by "uniqueness." last but not least, it is the "quality" of "uniqueness."

| |
  • I don't think you can have a quality of uniqueness as 'one of a kind' cannot have a modifier. Something can't be more 'one of a kind' than another. – GenericJam Apr 2 '14 at 20:55
  • Hmm. I would agree that in an abstract sense one thing cannot be more 'one of a kind' than another thing. However, in a concrete, real-world sense, I don't believe that uniqueness (or uniquity) is binary. Most objects are composed of many characteristics that are evaluated in many contexts, so you might say that "Lady Gaga is a more unique performer than Brittany Spears." This is an opinion, but it is still a valid use of the adjective. – badpanda Apr 4 '14 at 5:29
  • In the case of an algorithm that enumerates guaranteed-unique possibilities, would it be reasonable to refer to its disposition-for-uniqueness? – Charney Kaye Mar 15 '17 at 2:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .