-2

The Question Future tense and future perfect tense [closed] was marked as off-topic.

Admittedly, no sufficient followup for clarification was presented, but I wanted to ask (or at least find an answer to) the exact same [type of] question. Even if I did, would the question be marked a duplicate of a closed, off-topic, or could it have a chance at getting a response?

I didn't see the question being asked as "What is the correct answer?" The question is "What is the difference?" And that is more subtle and appropriate for this site. It's exactly the type of question that gets answered over and over with any other tense and is the question I seek an answer from experts.

Should I ask to move to reopen or ask anew?

Preemptively: I'm quite willing to accept that there's a duplicate with an answer, though titles for this type of question are too similarly labelled to effectively distinguish the appropriate future tense question from all the others. (Also, yes, even though there's no future tense, I'd still be interested in meaning difference.)

  • 2
    You have no idea how often we get this question. No idea. I used to answer some of them because I wanted to know, too. Then I learned from a few of the tons of grammar sites which are easy to find with any decent search engine, and posted. Until I got tired of it, then started finding dupes. This question has a ton of dupes. Then I started just closing. It's easy to find the answer, though, if you're interested. There's like a TON of grammar sites out there dealing with this stuff, no need for Fowler's on your lap. Honest, a ton. Is this starting to sound monotonous to you? Gen Ref. – anongoodnurse Dec 14 '14 at 1:11
  • grr. I've previously seen that linked one, too. (Temporal differences). Which ... ok, still would have liked the mentioned closed topic to have referenced. Nonetheless, I'm satisfied with the response here. Should I delete this question or allow it to be voted to delete? – SrJoven Dec 14 '14 at 1:11
  • We learn from downvoted questions. I'd leave it. Thanks, though. – anongoodnurse Dec 14 '14 at 1:12
2

The difference between the simple “will do” sort of construction and the perfective “will have done” one is surely a matter of ultra-super-hyper-duper-basic grammar — and thus one of General Reference.

Arguably, it’s also yet another candidate to be marked a duplicate of our number-one most frequently asked question of all time, “How do the tenses and aspects in English correspond temporally to one another?”, itself something of a catch-all for the infinitely many questions that ask about how this or that one verbal form differs from or is similar to that or this other verbal form.

And yes, there really are infinitely many such duplicate tense-and-aspect questions from people who can’t be bothered to use a basic grammar book. Such questions are simply far too basic, and too repetitive, to be interesting to etymologists, linguists, and serious language enthusiasts.

  • I commented before reading your answer fully. I think we both said pretty much the exact same thing, but your answer is so much better. +1 – anongoodnurse Dec 14 '14 at 1:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .