2

I was just wondering why my reputation hasn't changed after I deleted two downvoted answers and one downvoted question.

  • 1
    Just fyi meta up votes won't bring you reputation ;) – Helmar Nov 28 '16 at 8:53
  • You should note that it takes some time for lost reputation to be recovered. – user140086 Nov 28 '16 at 9:52
4

From what I can see of your reputation, you do appear to have recovered the losses incurred from downvoting.

With the baptism/christening question, your November 22 answer and your November 23 answer have both had their reputation penalties restored.

Your "exact origin of the English language" question resulted in a net movement of reputation of zero on November 25.

We don't normally post screenshots of what moderators see, so I don't particularly want to do that. But I can't see any error in the way the system has handled the reputation calculations here. It is a stable, robust and tested mechanism.

This is the time, though, to restate a warning about deleting badly-received posts. They still count in the automatic quality check. Rather than removing posts, you should attempt to improve them. With off-topic questions, it can be difficult to make them on-topic, so you need to be sure to post on-topic questions in the first place (but you removed your question without the community deciding it was off-topic). There is a question on MSE, the network-wide meta.stackexchange, about the post bans which can result from too many low-quality posts: deleting them only makes it more difficult to recover the situation because they remain low-quality.

I can't tell whether you're in any danger of triggering the post ban: I don't know what its criteria are; it's automatic and it just happens. You may be OK at the moment. But if you try and model your questions and answers on upvoted posts by high-rep users, you may receive more upvotes and find that you feel fewer deletions are necessary.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .