There's been a couple of spam-like or at least extremely low quality 'answers' today - firstly one on http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/383723/what-does-it-mean-to-have-a-quick-wit (which has now been deleted) and now one on http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/366478/finding-a-word-to-describe-that-which-is-fundamentally-real.

Granted, 
> hi i am piper kimbrel i have a best friend named ella

Isn't actually existing "only to promote a product or service", but it is at best trash and at worst clogging up the user experience for the rest of us and clogging up the servers.

Does this merit a 'spam' flag, or is 'not an answer' good enough?  Or is there no difference between them and how they are sorted? It appears to me to be [gibberish](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/58032/what-are-the-spam-and-rude-or-abusive-offensive-flags-and-how-do-they-wor/58035#58035), and though not actually “fsdguejgkfdlk" would merit spam, but is a 'spam' flag a little too hardcore in this case?