Timeline for Historical lock instead of closure for high view questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 12, 2016 at 15:53 | comment | added | Helmar | @MetaEd mainly what's considered large number of views or votes on ELU since those numbers are very site specific. | |
| Oct 11, 2016 at 22:02 | comment | added | MetaEd Mod | The article you linked to on historical locks actually has a good list of "when is it appropriate" and "when is it not appropriate". Beyond those, what are you looking for as general requirements for historical locks? | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 20:11 | history | asked | Helmar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |