Return to Question

Apparently, questions which actually ask about aspects of the English Language which might be interesting to linguists, etymologists or serious language enthusiasts are now banned on EL&U. Single word-request junkies who have the disinclination for such questions to appear on EL&U have started sending such questions to the English Language Learners site so as to be able to rid EL&U of such questions. Here is the latest example:

• “The carrots need being chopped” and “The carrots need to chop”

Do we need some mechanism to be able to stop this kind of behaviour from happening?

I can think of one method that might work. Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users who have sufficient reputation in relation to that tag, or related tags in order to stop them being closed by careless users.

[I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question]

Apparently, questions which actually ask about aspects of the English Language which might be interesting to linguists, etymologists or serious language enthusiasts are now banned on EL&U. Single word-request junkies who have the disinclination for such questions to appear on EL&U have started sending such questions to the English Language Learners site so as to be able to rid EL&U of such questions. Here is the latest example:

• “The carrots need being chopped” and “The carrots need to chop”

Do we need some mechanism to be able to stop this kind of behaviour from happening?

I can think of one method that might work. Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users who have sufficient reputation in relation to that tag, or related tags in order to stop them being closed by careless users.

[I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question]

Apparently, questions which actually ask about aspects of the English Language which might be interesting to linguists, etymologists or serious language enthusiasts are now banned on EL&U. Single word-request junkies who have the disinclination for such questions to appear on EL&U have started sending such questions to the English Language Learners site so as to be able to rid EL&U of such questions. Here is the latest example:

• “The carrots need being chopped” and “The carrots need to chop”

Do we need some mechanism to be able to stop this kind of behaviour from happening?

I can think of one method that might work. Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users who have sufficient reputation in relation to that tag, or related tags in order to stop them being closed by careless users.

[I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question]

Apparently, questions which actually ask about aspects of the English Language which might be interesting to linguists, etymologists or serious language enthusiasts are now banned on EL&U. Single word-request junkies who have the disinclination for such questions to appear on EL&U have started sending such questions to the English Language Learners site so as to be able to rid EL&U of such questions. Here is the latest example:

• “The carrots need being chopped” and “The carrots need to chop”

Do we need some mechanism to be able to stop this kind of behaviour from happening?

I can think of one method that might work. Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users who have sufficient reputation in relation to that tag, or related tags in order to stop them being closed by careless users.

[I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question]

Apparently, questions which actually ask about aspects of the English Language which might be interesting to linguists, etymologists or serious language enthusiasts are now banned on EL&U. Single word-request junkies who have the disinclination for such questions to appear on EL&U have started sending such questions to the English Language Learners site so as to be able to rid EL&U of such questions. Here is the latest example:

• “The carrots need being chopped” and “The carrots need to chop”

Do we need some mechanism to be able to stop this kind of behaviour from happening?

I can think of one method that might work. Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions - that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiats - should be protectable by users who have sufficient reputation in relation to that tag, or related tags in order to stop them being closed by careless users.

[I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question]

Apparently, questions which actually ask about aspects of the English Language which might be interesting to linguists, etymologists or serious language enthusiasts are now banned on EL&U. Single word-request junkies who have the disinclination for such questions to appear on EL&U have started sending such questions to the English Language Learners site so as to be able to rid EL&U of such questions. Here is the latest example:

• “The carrots need being chopped” and “The carrots need to chop”

Do we need some mechanism to be able to stop this kind of behaviour from happening?

I can think of one method that might work. Certain types of question, for example grammar, syntax, phonetics and etymology questions – that may often be answered by linguistics professors or real language enthusiasts – should be protectable by users who have sufficient reputation in relation to that tag, or related tags in order to stop them being closed by careless users.

[I also feel that people whose primary tag is for SWRs shouldn't be able to close-vote questions which don't have a SWR tag, but that's another question]